linux-kernel - Re: Oops: 17 SMP ARM (v3.16-rc2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5ACj6ER3tUMS8XsnigT=-zs4TZFmobbtmTN-+LWJFLt4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Aug 2014 11:20:38 -0300
From:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Mattis Lorentzon <Mattis.Lorentzon@...oliv.com>,
	Fredrik Noring <fredrik.noring@...oliv.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Oops: 17 SMP ARM (v3.16-rc2)

On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> Hmm, I'm slightly confused.  On my iMX6Q, I have:
>
> 150:     581754          0          0          0       GIC 150  2188000.ethernet
> 151:          0          0          0          0       GIC 151  2188000.ethernet

Same here on a mx6qsabresd.

> In the DT file, we have:
>
>                         fec: ethernet@...88000 {
>                                 compatible = "fsl,imx6q-fec";
>                                 reg = <0x02188000 0x4000>;
>                                 interrupts-extended =
>                                         <&intc 0 118 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>                                         <&intc 0 119 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>                                 clocks = <&clks 117>, <&clks 117>, <&clks 190>;
>                                 clock-names = "ipg", "ahb", "ptp";
>                                 status = "disabled";
>                         };
>
> which, for the gic, would be 118 + 32 (first SPI) = 150, 119 + 32 = 151.
> Yet you seem to have nothing registered against GIC 150, instead having
> an interrupt against GPIO 6.
>
> This seems very odd, and as this is an on-SoC device, I don't see why
> you would want to bind the interrupts for the FEC device any differently
> to standard platforms.
>
> This could well be the cause of your stalls.
>
> What's GPIO 6 used for on your board?

On a imx6q sabreauto I also get:

151:          0          0          0          0       GIC 151  2188000.ethernet
166:       4577          0          0          0  gpio-mxc   6  2188000.ethernet

and the GPIO1_6 interrupt comes from this commit:

commit bc20a5d6da718f9d60da0a78f70c653c1cd16af3
Author: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 20 11:47:12 2013 -0700

    ARM: dts: imx6qdl-sabreauto: use GPIO_6 for FEC interrupt.

    This works around a hardware bug.

    Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
    Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/