[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJgRFYTfdsY48C9QreBH=VcM3t-9AzFSV8oXLB5tVGjUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:22:28 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, Liu hua <sdu.liu@...wei.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
Nikolay Borisov <Nikolay.Borisov@....com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm: use generic fixmap.h
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> ARM is different from other architectures in that fixmap pages are indexed
>> with a positive offset from FIXADDR_START. Other architectures index with
>> a negative offset from FIXADDR_TOP. In order to use the generic fixmap.h
>
> Does anybody know if there's any reason why generic fixmap.h uses negative
> offsets? It complicates things with no obvious benefit if you e.g. try to align
> virtual address in the fixmap region with physical page color (that's why I've
> switched xtensa to positive fixmap addressing in v3.17).
No, but each arch doing it differently is even more annoying.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists