[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140807164725.GA22421@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:47:25 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Yufeng Shen <miletus@...omium.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - Get IRQ edge/level flags on DT
booting
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 09:49:49AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> On 08/07/2014 08:09 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >>
> >> > irq_of_parse_and_map() already sets up IRQ trigger type based on DT
> >> > data, by calling irq_create_of_mapping() which in turn calls
> >> > irq_set_irq_type().
> >> >
> >>
> >> Right but somehow when the IRQ is actually requested the type is overwritten by
> >> the value passed to request_threaded_irq() and interrupts are not being
> >> generated by the device without this patch.
> >>
> >> Do you think that this is a bug in the "interrupt-parent" irqchip driver or the
> >> IRQ core? I'm not that familiar with the IRQ subsystem.
> >
> > No, this is clearly driver fault - it smashed previously done setup with new
> > flags.
> >
>
> Thanks a lot for the clarification. That was my understanding as well but wanted
> to be sure.
Actually, I take this back. In mainline everything as it should: if
pdata does not specify particular trigger the flags requested end up
being IRQF_ONESHOT, which should preserve trigger bits previously set up
by the board or OF code. In Chrome kernel we have:
/* Default to falling edge if no platform data provided */
irqflags = data->pdata ? data->pdata->irqflags : IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
error = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL, mxt_interrupt,
irqflags | IRQF_ONESHOT,
client->name, data);
which I believe should go away. If it is needed on ACPI systems we need
to figure out how to do things we can do with OF there.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists