[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1407450408-11679-4-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:26:44 -0400
From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] locking/rwsem: rwsem_can_spin_on_owner can be called with preemption enabled
The rwsem_can_spin_on_owner() function can be called with preemption
enabled. This patch moves it before preempt_disable() so that it won't
do unnecessary preemption operations when spinning is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index ddd56d2..c8887ba 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -404,11 +404,11 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
bool taken = false;
int spincnt = 0;
- preempt_disable();
-
/* sem->wait_lock should not be held when doing optimistic spinning */
if (!rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(sem))
- goto done;
+ return false;
+
+ preempt_disable();
if (!osq_lock(&sem->osq))
goto done;
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists