lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 15:22:07 +0900 From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>, Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>, "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>, Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>, Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>, Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, t.stanislaws@...sung.com, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/isolation: remove unstable check for isolated page On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:49:17PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 08/06/2014 09:18 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > >The check '!PageBuddy(page) && page_count(page) == 0 && > >migratetype == MIGRATE_ISOLATE' would mean the page on free processing. > > What is "the page on free processing"? I thought this test means the > page is on some CPU's pcplist? Yes, you are right. > > >Although it could go into buddy allocator within a short time, > >futher operation such as isolate_freepages_range() in CMA, called after > >test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(), could be failed due to this unstability > > By "unstability" you mean the page can be allocated again from the > pcplist instead of being freed to buddy list? Yes. > >since it requires that the page is on buddy. I think that removing > >this unstability is good thing. > > > >And, following patch makes isolated freepage has new status matched with > >this condition and this check is the obstacle to that change. So remove > >it. > > You could also say that pages from isolated pageblocks can no longer > appear on pcplists after the later patches. Okay. I will do it. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists