[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140808184655.GA20958@udknight>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 02:46:56 +0800
From: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
jhovold@...il.com, andi@...as.de, dforsi@...il.com,
gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Resend Re: [PATCH v6] usb:serial:pl2303: add GPIOs interface on
PL2303
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:54:42AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 03:10:34AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:54:08PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > > I noticed that setting direction to output and setting the gpio high has
> > > > > no effect on the read-back value (i.e. I still read back 0) for my
> > > > > pl2303hx (note that my device has no easily accessible gpios so I
> > > > > haven't verified the actual state of the output pin).
> > > > >
> > > > > What happens on your system? Is the read-back value still 0, even when
> > > > > the GPIO output is actually high? Should we return the cached value in
> > > > > this case?
> > > >
> > > > If i set direction to output, then I could control gpio high and low
> > > > by set 1 or 0, and the read-back value is 1 or 0 according to high and
> > > > low(I test high and low by oscillscope)
> > > >
> > > > I test it with my pl2303hx with only two gpios.
> > > >
> > > > Could you use usbmon to see whether the traffic is right according
> > > > to comment in struct pl2303_gpio?
> > >
> > > The traffic appears correct judging from the debug output (which I
> > > trust). Output-enable is reflected in register 0x81, but the value
> > > isn't.
> > >
> > > What is the lsusb -v output for your device?
> >
> > Bus 001 Device 005: ID 067b:2303 Prolific Technology, Inc. PL2303 Serial Port.
>
> You forgot the verbose flag (-v).
Sorry, below is output with -v:
Bus 002 Device 004: ID 067b:2303 Prolific Technology, Inc. PL2303 Serial Port
Device Descriptor:
bLength 18
bDescriptorType 1
bcdUSB 1.10
bDeviceClass 0 (Defined at Interface level)
bDeviceSubClass 0
bDeviceProtocol 0
bMaxPacketSize0 64
idVendor 0x067b Prolific Technology, Inc.
idProduct 0x2303 PL2303 Serial Port
bcdDevice 3.00
iManufacturer 1 Prolific Technology Inc.
iProduct 2 USB-Serial Controller
iSerial 0
bNumConfigurations 1
Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength 39
bNumInterfaces 1
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration 0
bmAttributes 0x80
(Bus Powered)
MaxPower 100mA
Interface Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 4
bInterfaceNumber 0
bAlternateSetting 0
bNumEndpoints 3
bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class
bInterfaceSubClass 0
bInterfaceProtocol 0
iInterface 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x81 EP 1 IN
bmAttributes 3
Transfer Type Interrupt
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x000a 1x 10 bytes
bInterval 1
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x02 EP 2 OUT
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x83 EP 3 IN
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Device Status: 0x0000
(Bus Powered)
>
> > It is strange your device doesn't work, I verify the control method by
> > analyze usbmon output from linux host which has VirtualBox running
> > gpio test program, but I don't have right to distribute the gpio test
> > program I think, so I can't help you to figure out why it doesn't work
> > for your device.
>
> What do you use the gpio test program for? I thought you verified the
> gpios with a scope?
Yes, I verified gpios with a scope.
"
You must allocate the buffer dynamically as some platforms cannot do DMA to the stack.
"
Thanks very much for point out it, could you clarify it?
I want to know the reason.
I am working on next version patch and hope it could be finished this weekend. :)
Thanks again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists