lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri,  8 Aug 2014 13:39:14 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 131/259] aio: protect reqs_available updates from changes in interrupt handlers

3.13.11.6 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>

commit 263782c1c95bbddbb022dc092fd89a36bb8d5577 upstream.

As of commit f8567a3845ac05bb28f3c1b478ef752762bd39ef it is now possible to
have put_reqs_available() called from irq context.  While put_reqs_available()
is per cpu, it did not protect itself from interrupts on the same CPU.  This
lead to aio_complete() corrupting the available io requests count when run
under a heavy O_DIRECT workloads as reported by Robert Elliott.  Fix this by
disabling irq updates around the per cpu batch updates of reqs_available.

Many thanks to Robert and folks for testing and tracking this down.

Reported-by: Robert Elliot <Elliott@...com>
Tested-by: Robert Elliot <Elliott@...com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 fs/aio.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index 19e7d95..a0d9e43 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -816,16 +816,20 @@ void exit_aio(struct mm_struct *mm)
 static void put_reqs_available(struct kioctx *ctx, unsigned nr)
 {
 	struct kioctx_cpu *kcpu;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	kcpu = this_cpu_ptr(ctx->cpu);
 
+	local_irq_save(flags);
 	kcpu->reqs_available += nr;
+
 	while (kcpu->reqs_available >= ctx->req_batch * 2) {
 		kcpu->reqs_available -= ctx->req_batch;
 		atomic_add(ctx->req_batch, &ctx->reqs_available);
 	}
 
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
@@ -833,10 +837,12 @@ static bool get_reqs_available(struct kioctx *ctx)
 {
 	struct kioctx_cpu *kcpu;
 	bool ret = false;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	kcpu = this_cpu_ptr(ctx->cpu);
 
+	local_irq_save(flags);
 	if (!kcpu->reqs_available) {
 		int old, avail = atomic_read(&ctx->reqs_available);
 
@@ -855,6 +861,7 @@ static bool get_reqs_available(struct kioctx *ctx)
 	ret = true;
 	kcpu->reqs_available--;
 out:
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
 	preempt_enable();
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists