lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri,  8 Aug 2014 13:39:02 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 119/259] fuse: ignore entry-timeout on LOOKUP_REVAL

3.13.11.6 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>

commit 154210ccb3a871e631bf39fdeb7a8731d98af87b upstream.

The following test case demonstrates the bug:

  sh# mount -t glusterfs localhost:meta-test /mnt/one

  sh# mount -t glusterfs localhost:meta-test /mnt/two

  sh# echo stuff > /mnt/one/file; rm -f /mnt/two/file; echo stuff > /mnt/one/file
  bash: /mnt/one/file: Stale file handle

  sh# echo stuff > /mnt/one/file; rm -f /mnt/two/file; sleep 1; echo stuff > /mnt/one/file

On the second open() on /mnt/one, FUSE would have used the old
nodeid (file handle) trying to re-open it. Gluster is returning
-ESTALE. The ESTALE propagates back to namei.c:filename_lookup()
where lookup is re-attempted with LOOKUP_REVAL. The right
behavior now, would be for FUSE to ignore the entry-timeout and
and do the up-call revalidation. Instead FUSE is ignoring
LOOKUP_REVAL, succeeding the revalidation (because entry-timeout
has not passed), and open() is again retried on the old file
handle and finally the ESTALE is going back to the application.

Fix: if revalidation is happening with LOOKUP_REVAL, then ignore
entry-timeout and always do the up-call.

Signed-off-by: Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 fs/fuse/dir.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
index ba60cfd..989dabd 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int fuse_dentry_revalidate(struct dentry *entry, unsigned int flags)
 	inode = ACCESS_ONCE(entry->d_inode);
 	if (inode && is_bad_inode(inode))
 		goto invalid;
-	else if (time_before64(fuse_dentry_time(entry), get_jiffies_64())) {
+	else if (time_before64(fuse_dentry_time(entry), get_jiffies_64()) ||
+		 (flags & LOOKUP_REVAL)) {
 		int err;
 		struct fuse_entry_out outarg;
 		struct fuse_req *req;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists