[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1408090152240.11855@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 01:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] freezer: check OOM kill signal while being frozen
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014, Cong Wang wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c
> index aa6a8aa..c6d189d 100644
> --- a/kernel/freezer.c
> +++ b/kernel/freezer.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,9 @@ bool __refrigerator(bool check_kthr_stop)
> spin_lock_irq(&freezer_lock);
> current->flags |= PF_FROZEN;
> if (!freezing(current) ||
> - (check_kthr_stop && kthread_should_stop()))
> + (check_kthr_stop && kthread_should_stop()) ||
> + (test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_MEMDIE) &&
> + fatal_signal_pending(current)))
> current->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN;
> spin_unlock_irq(&freezer_lock);
>
All threads with TIF_MEMDIE set would have been killed, why is the check
for fatal_signal_pending(current) needed?
You can also use test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) instead since you're only
concerned with current.
Furthermore, that conditional is getting difficult to read. Maybe it
would help to have a helper function that returns bool that determines
whether PF_FROZEN should be cleared?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists