[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140810153539.GA9490@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 17:35:39 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Flipped jump labels
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:13:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Wouldn't using STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE and static_key_true() [instead of
> !static_key_false()] result in the same good code placement effects?
Nope, not really. static_key_true() is !static_key_false() and we're not
changing anything, logically. ASM looks non-optimal here, in any case,
with the "true" version.
Also, the problem in this particular use case in native_sched_clock is
that we want to do some initialization first before we enable the RDTSC,
i.e., the likely branch.
So we want to have the following static layout after build:
JMP
likely
unlikely
and the initialization code turns the JMP into a NOP at runtime.
Basically something like alternatives. :-)
Current jump labels do not have the possibility to get generated as
jump-to-unlikely labels which get changed at init time - they issue
NOPs only.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists