linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1407642119.5124.45.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Sun, 10 Aug 2014 05:41:59 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Sergey Oboguev <oboguev.public@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khalid.aziz@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio)

On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 05:13 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:04 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: 
> > > NAK.  There it is, my imaginary NAK to imaginary realtime priorities :)
> > 
> > Ok, but do you have any alternative proposal yourself how to solve the
> > lockholder preemption problem? I assume you agree it's a real problem.
> > 
> > Just being negative is not very constructive.
> 
> I both acknowledged the problem problem, and made alternative
> suggestions.

Note who I replied to

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/28/77

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/