lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1407739313377-921802.post@n7.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:41:53 -0700 (PDT) From: sanjeev sharma <sanjeevsharmaengg@...il.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is spin_is_locked() safe to use with BUG_ON()/WARN_ON()? Hello All, I think still this is not being replaced with assert_spin_lock_held() call as suggested by Linus.It is worth to replace these calls. Sanjeev Sharma -- View this message in context: http://linux-kernel.2935.n7.nabble.com/Is-spin-is-locked-safe-to-use-with-BUG-ON-WARN-ON-tp654800p921802.html Sent from the Linux Kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/