[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53E8A5A4.5000405@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:14:44 +0200
From: "xavier.gnata@...il.com" <xavier.gnata@...il.com>
To: Lan Tianyu <lantianyu1986@...il.com>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
CC: "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r kernel org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: Don't re-select SBS battery if it's already
selected
On 14/03/2014 06:39, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> 2014-03-12 6:20 GMT+08:00 Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>:
>> The existing SBS code explicitly sets the selected battery in the SBS
>> manager regardless of whether the battery in question is already selected.
>> This causes bus timeouts on Apple hardware. Check for this case and avoid
>> it.
>>
> Hi Matthew:
> This patch is to avoid a redundant battery select operation when
> the battery is selected. But the symptom "bus timeouts" is a bus transaction
> issue, right? Will this happen during other SBS write/read operations? Do we
> need to increase the wait time of SMBUS transaction?
Well, the patch does the job and is needed on a macbook air.
What should we test to make it potentially better?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/sbs.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sbs.c b/drivers/acpi/sbs.c
>> index dbd4849..c386505 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/sbs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sbs.c
>> @@ -470,17 +470,25 @@ static struct device_attribute alarm_attr = {
>> static int acpi_battery_read(struct acpi_battery *battery)
>> {
>> int result = 0, saved_present = battery->present;
>> - u16 state;
>> + u16 state, selected, desired;
>>
>> if (battery->sbs->manager_present) {
>> result = acpi_smbus_read(battery->sbs->hc, SMBUS_READ_WORD,
>> ACPI_SBS_MANAGER, 0x01, (u8 *)&state);
>> if (!result)
>> battery->present = state & (1 << battery->id);
>> - state &= 0x0fff;
>> - state |= 1 << (battery->id + 12);
>> - acpi_smbus_write(battery->sbs->hc, SMBUS_WRITE_WORD,
>> - ACPI_SBS_MANAGER, 0x01, (u8 *)&state, 2);
>> + /*
>> + * Don't switch battery if the correct one is already selected
>> + */
>> + selected = state & 0xf000;
>> + desired = 1 << (battery->id + 12);
>> + if (selected != desired) {
>> + state &= 0x0fff;
>> + state |= desired;
>> + acpi_smbus_write(battery->sbs->hc, SMBUS_WRITE_WORD,
>> + ACPI_SBS_MANAGER, 0x01,
>> + (u8 *)&state, 2);
>> + }
>> } else if (battery->id == 0)
>> battery->present = 1;
>> if (result || !battery->present)
>> --
>> 1.8.5.3
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists