lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:54:22 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <>
To:	Srikrishan Malik <>,
	Joe Perches <>,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] staging: lustre: Fix misplaced opening brace

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:27:06PM +0530, Srikrishan Malik wrote:
> This patch set is aimed at removing checkpatch issues from files in
> lustre/lustre/mdc.
> Is it ok if I just fix those in this set and post another patch set
> to take care of other issues identified in review?

checkpatch fixes are worthless if they don't make the code better for
human readers.

> - removing typedef for ldlm_policy_data_t will touch many other
> files/dirs which were not initially targeted for this patch set.

Yeah.  You're right.  This should be done in a separate patch because
it doesn't completely fall under the "cleanup variable declarations in
mdc_enqueue()" header.

> - There can be a separate patch to remove __u64.

It's all part of the same thing "variable declarations in that

dan carpenter
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists