| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140811110745.GJ11899@mwanda> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:54:22 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> To: Srikrishan Malik <srikrishanmalik@...il.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, greg@...ah.com, andreas.dilger@...el.com, oleg.drokin@...el.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] staging: lustre: Fix misplaced opening brace warnings On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:27:06PM +0530, Srikrishan Malik wrote: > This patch set is aimed at removing checkpatch issues from files in > lustre/lustre/mdc. > > Is it ok if I just fix those in this set and post another patch set > to take care of other issues identified in review? checkpatch fixes are worthless if they don't make the code better for human readers. > > - removing typedef for ldlm_policy_data_t will touch many other > files/dirs which were not initially targeted for this patch set. Yeah. You're right. This should be done in a separate patch because it doesn't completely fall under the "cleanup variable declarations in mdc_enqueue()" header. > - There can be a separate patch to remove __u64. It's all part of the same thing "variable declarations in that function." regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists