[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1408111503550.2518@hadrien>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/coccinelle/free/ifnullfree.cocci: simplify and
extend to of_node_put
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > @r depends on context || report || org @
> > @@ -37,7 +35,8 @@ position p;
> > @@
> >
> > * if (E)
> > -* \(kfree@p\|debugfs_remove@p\|debugfs_remove_recursive@p\|usb_free_urb\)(E);
> > +* \(kfree@p\|debugfs_remove@p\|debugfs_remove_recursive@p\|usb_free_urb@p\|
> > +* of_node_put@p\)(E);
>
> Why do you want to limit this semantic patch pattern to such a small list of
> function names?
Because these are the ones that kernel developers have cited as
interesting for this kind of transformation.
> Would you like to consider also the hundreds of other functions which perform
> input parameter validation?
Personally, no. I think I have explained why several times already.
julia
> Are you interested to make the checked list more complete with further
> (eventually automatic?) extensions?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists