linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 00/21] LED / flash API integration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:24:35 +0200
From:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
To:	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	b.zolnierkie@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 00/21] LED / flash API integration

Hi Bryan,

On 08/08/2014 06:59 PM, Bryan Wu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Jacek Anaszewski
> <j.anaszewski@...sung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Bryan,
>>
>>
>> On 07/16/2014 07:21 PM, Bryan Wu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Jacek Anaszewski
>>>> <j.anaszewski@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is is the fourth version of the patch series being a follow up
>>>>> of the discussion on Media summit 2013-10-23, related to the
>>>>> LED / flash API integration (the notes from the discussion were
>>>>> enclosed in the message [1], paragraph 5).
>>>>> The series is based on linux-next-20140707
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I really apologize that I missed your discussion email in my Gmail
>>>> inbox, it was archived some where. Even in this series some of these
>>>> patches are archived in different tab.
>>>>
>>>> I will start to review and help to push this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> In the mean time, could you please provide an git tree for me to pull?
>>> It's much easier for me to review in my git.
>>
>>
>> Few days ago I sent to your private email the path to the git
>> repository to pull, but I am resending it through the lists to
>> make sure that it will not get filtered somehow again.
>>
>>
>> git://linuxtv.org/snawrocki/samsung.git
>> branch: led_flash_integration_v4
>>
>> gitweb:
>> http://git.linuxtv.org/cgit.cgi/snawrocki/samsung.git/log/?h=led_flash_integration_v4
>>
>
> Yes, I got it. I merged some leds core fixing patches from you
> recently. So could you please split these big patchset into several
> small parts which should be easier for reviewing and discussion.
>   - led core fixing
>   - led flash core patches
>   - led flash manager patches
>   - v4l2 led patches
>   - Documentations
>
> My plan is to review these and merge them to my -devel branch. Then
> invite people for testing.

Thanks for merging the fixes. I will come up with a new patch sets,
in the form as you requested, but I would like to apply as many
improvements, in comparison to the version 4, as possible. Therefore
I'd be grateful if you could express your opinion in the discussion [1].

Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg79400.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/