[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140811160222.GF17528@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:02:22 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@...il.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: Add tps65090 FET constraints on
Peach Pit and Pi
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 08:57:24AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> > After the switch is turned on, a safety timer is started
> > and before this timer times out the output voltage must
> > have reached the input voltage. Otherwise the switch is
> > turned off expecting an overload condition.
> > So using the maximum output voltage slew rate and the timer
> > minimum and maximum timeouts, a voltage constraints can be
> > expressed as bounded limits for the timeout. That is what
> > is used in the board schematics and should be in the DT too.
> I don't understand this, but if you and Mark are happy with it...
I have not looked at this change to my knowledge.
> ...I'm also not 100% certain what the above description has to do with
> this change, but I'll admit to having only skimmed some of the earlier
> conversations.
It's not at all clear to me either looking at the quoted section.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists