lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:08:48 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <>
To:	Vivek Goyal <>
CC:	Shaun Ruffell <>,,,,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] purgatory: Core purgatory functionality

On 08/11/2014 11:02 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi hpa,
> I took it because kexec-tools uses it and in one of the committs Eric
> gave following reasoning.
>     On x86_64 use -mcmodel=large so that the code is built without
>     any 32bit assumptions.  -mcmodel=medium and -mcmodel=small
>     result int code that has 32bit relocations against variables
>     that can live anywhere in the address space
> We do want to load purgatory anywhere in the address space. 
> But if there are other ways to achieve the same thing, I will do that
> change.
> So when you say "small PIC", I need to use -mcmodel=small and -fPIC?

Actually -fPIE is probably better than -fPIC.

-mcmodel=large is incompatible with all other code out there, which
means that even though it is supposed to work it will be poorly tested
at best.  So even despite the gcc version issue, using the small PIC
model would be better.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists