[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140811201744.GD8397@lenovo-rd230-04.lab.bos.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:17:45 -0400
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...erainc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] percpu_tags: Prototype implementation
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:20:56PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> The performance test is not decent, though. I used "fio" random
> read against a "null_blk" device sitting on top of "percpu_tags",
> which is not exactly how "percpu_ida" is used. This is another
> reason I am posting - an advice on how to properly test is very
> appreciated.
Hi Nicholas et al,
I expect the best possible performance test for percpu_ida/percpu_tags
would be to stress drivers/vhost/scsi.c vhost_scsi_get_tag() function.
I tried to make such test by attaching ramdisk to a virtual machine
(similar to https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/10/347) but ultimately failed
to configure the necessary environment - the stock qemu does not have
-vhost-scsi parameter.
Could you please advice how to make this configuration exposed to guests?
o- / ..................................................................... [...]
o- backstores .......................................................... [...]
| o- block .............................................. [Storage Objects: 0]
| o- fileio ............................................. [Storage Objects: 0]
| o- pscsi .............................................. [Storage Objects: 0]
| o- ramdisk ............................................ [Storage Objects: 1]
| o- rda .............................................. [(1.0GiB) activated]
o- iscsi ........................................................ [Targets: 0]
o- loopback ..................................................... [Targets: 0]
o- vhost ........................................................ [Targets: 1]
o- naa.5001405b171ee405 .......................................... [TPGs: 1]
o- tpg1 .............................. [naa.5001405983a5b1a4, no-gen-acls]
o- acls ...................................................... [ACLs: 0]
o- luns ...................................................... [LUNs: 1]
o- lun0 ................................................ [ramdisk/rda]
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists