lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1407797345-28227-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:49:02 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	bobby.prani@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 tip/core/rcu 13/16] rcu: Make rcu_tasks_kthread()'s GP-wait loop allow preemption

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

The grace-period-wait loop in rcu_tasks_kthread() is under (unnecessary)
RCU protection, and therefore has no preemption points in a PREEMPT=n
kernel.  This commit therefore removes the RCU protection and inserts
cond_resched().

Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/update.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index a4140f25cf1a..2ae6fb8752d4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static void check_holdout_task(struct task_struct *t,
 	    (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) &&
 	     !is_idle_task(t) && t->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu >= 0)) {
 		ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_holdout) = 0;
-		list_del_rcu(&t->rcu_tasks_holdout_list);
+		list_del_init(&t->rcu_tasks_holdout_list);
 		put_task_struct(t);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -576,6 +576,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
 			bool firstreport;
 			bool needreport;
 			int rtst;
+			struct task_struct *t1;
 
 			schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ);
 			rtst = ACCESS_ONCE(rcu_task_stall_timeout);
@@ -585,11 +586,11 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
 				lastreport = jiffies;
 			firstreport = true;
 			WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
-			rcu_read_lock();
-			list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &rcu_tasks_holdouts,
-						rcu_tasks_holdout_list)
+			list_for_each_entry_safe(t, t1, &rcu_tasks_holdouts,
+						rcu_tasks_holdout_list) {
 				check_holdout_task(t, needreport, &firstreport);
-			rcu_read_unlock();
+				cond_resched();
+			}
 		}
 
 		/*
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ