linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: export basic memory events for IVT IMC PMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140812070915.GM9918@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:09:15 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	zheng.z.yan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: export basic memory events for IVT IMC
 PMU

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:00:31AM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> index cfc6f9d..800e087 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> @@ -1391,6 +1391,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type ivt_uncore_imc = {
>  	.fixed_ctr_bits	= 48,
>  	.fixed_ctr	= SNBEP_MC_CHy_PCI_PMON_FIXED_CTR,
>  	.fixed_ctl	= SNBEP_MC_CHy_PCI_PMON_FIXED_CTL,
> +	.event_descs	= snbep_uncore_imc_events,
>  	IVT_UNCORE_PCI_COMMON_INIT(),
>  };

I changed that to the below; seeing how I have the uncore splitup
patches.

Also, I'm very tempted to do a s/ivt/ivbep/ on that whole thing. We
really should not mix all these stupid names.

---
Subject: perf/x86/uncore: export basic memory events for IVT IMC PMU
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:00:31 +0200

This patch exposes two basic events for Ivytown IMC uncore PMU:

- cas_count_read: number of full-cache line reads to memory controller
- cas_count_write: number of full-cache line writes to memory controller

Those events use the same encoding as for SNB-EP, so reuse the same
event table. See specification in:

http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/manuals/xeon-e5-2600-v2-uncore-manual.pdf

By aggregating all the read and write events from all the memory controllers
of each processor socket, one can determine the total memory bandwidth utilization.

Cc: zheng.z.yan@...el.com
Cc: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140812060031.GA25239@quad
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
@@ -1422,6 +1422,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type ivt_unco
 	.fixed_ctr_bits	= 48,
 	.fixed_ctr	= SNBEP_MC_CHy_PCI_PMON_FIXED_CTR,
 	.fixed_ctl	= SNBEP_MC_CHy_PCI_PMON_FIXED_CTL,
+	.event_descs	= snbep_uncore_imc_events,
 	IVT_UNCORE_PCI_COMMON_INIT(),
 };
 

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped