[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokBE=r0oxF9Y-Cmu2HuLHnwKV4w+kFays=WY8TwD93oFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:47:43 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
"Srivatsa S . Bhat" <srivatsa@....edu>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend
On 7 August 2014 16:21, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 1 August 2014 03:26, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>> I'm still quite unsure how this is going to work with the real CPU hot-remove
>> that makes the entire sysfs cpu directories go away. Can you please explain
>> that?
>
> I have little less knowledge on this kind of hotplugs, can you please enlighten
> me with some info about this?
>
> Are we talking about big servers which are actually a combination of multiple
> motherboards (with SoC's), and any motherboard can be plugged out at
> run time. Obviously a single kernel would be running for all these motherboards.
>
> I don't know if we already support that.. Sorry for my lack of
> knowledge on this..
Ping!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists