[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <53E9FF6A020000780002B7B7@mail.emea.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:50:02 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Denys Vlasenko" <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...capital.net>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Will Drewry" <wad@...omium.org>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Denys Vlasenko" <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
"X86 ML" <x86@...nel.org>, "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@...mgrid.com>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete
"struct pt_regs"
>>> On 12.08.14 at 11:31, <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> Jan, Pater, does this look correct _and_ human-understandable?
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -652,10 +652,14 @@ END(interrupt)
> cmovzq PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_ptr),%rsp
> CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsi
> pushq %rsi
> + /*
> + * For debugger:
> + * "CFA (Current Frame Address) is the value on stack + offset"
> + */
> CFI_ESCAPE 0x0f /* DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression */, 6, \
> - 0x77 /* DW_OP_breg7 */, 0, \
> + 0x77 /* DW_OP_breg7 (rsp) */, 0, \
I'm fine with the changes above.
> 0x06 /* DW_OP_deref */, \
> - 0x08 /* DW_OP_const1u */, SS+8-RBP, \
> + 0x08 /* DW_OP_const1u */, SIZEOF_PTREGS-RBP, \
But I'd rather not see this one alone changed - either change all
similar uses of SS, or leave the one here alone.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists