[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140812133018.3b199bf0@bbrezillon>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:30:18 +0200
From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] drm: rework flip-work framework
Hi Rob,
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:20:09 -0400
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Boris BREZILLON
> <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:06:06 +0200
> > Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This patch series reworks the flip-work framework to make it safe when
> >> calling drm_flip_work_queue from atomic contexts.
> >>
> >> The 2nd patch of this series is optional, as it only reworks
> >> drm_flip_work_init prototype to remove unneeded size argument and
> >> return code (this function cannot fail anymore).
> >
> >
> > Atmel HLCDC driver now depends on this series and I'd like to get as
> > much thing as possible for HLCDC support in 3.18 (if the driver can't
> > make it for 3.18, at least the dependencies could).
> >
> > David, Rob (and other DRM/KMS developers) do you have any concern you
> > would like addressed in this patch series ?
>
> it already has my r-b :-)
Yes, I know, I was just checking that you were still okay with this
series ;-).
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists