linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tcp: don't use timestamp from repaired skb-s to calculate RTT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140812123320.GA27421@paralelels.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:33:20 +0400
From:	Andrew Vagin <avagin@...allels.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: don't use timestamp from repaired skb-s to
 calculate RTT

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:15:01AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 13:45 +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > We don't know right timestamp for repaired skb-s. Wrong RTT estimations
> > isn't good, because some congestion modules heavily depends on it.
> > 
> > This patch adds the TCPCB_REPAIRED flag, which is included in
> > TCPCB_RETRANS.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +
> > +				/* All packets are restored as if they have
> > +				 * already been sent. skb_mstamp isn't set to
> > +				 * avoid wrong rtt estimation.
> > +				 */
> > +				if (tp->repair) {
> > +					TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked |= TCPCB_REPAIRED;
> > +					TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when = tcp_time_stamp;
> > +				}
> >  			}
> >  
> >  			/* Try to append data to the end of skb. */
> 
> 
> Are you sure TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when needs to be set ?

It's used in tcp_rearm_rto() for calculating a retransmit timeout.
...
	const u32 rto_time_stamp = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when + rto;
	s32 delta = (s32)(rto_time_stamp - tcp_time_stamp);
...

"when" is used as a start point, so I think it's acceptable here.

I will add a comment. Thanks.

> 
> It should not anymore.
> 
> If yes, I believe a comment would help a lot here.
> 
> Also, please include this tag to ease stable backports (3.15+) :
> 
> Fixes: 431a91242d8d ("tcp: timestamp SYN+DATA messages")
> Fixes: 740b0f1841f6 ("tcp: switch rtt estimations to usec resolution")

Thanks,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/