[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140812191444.GW18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 20:14:45 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] VFS revoke()
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:54:04PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Open questions:
> * Obviously, we need to protect all calls into file->f_op->xyz(). This series
> provides enter_file() and leave_file() that can be used like:
> if (enter_file(file))
> retval = file->f_op->xyz(file, ...);
> else
> retval = -ENODEV;
> Question is, should we do this at the time we actually invoke those
> callbacks or should we do it at the syscall-entry time?
The former, obviously. The real bitch is around mmap - you don't need
that for evdev, but generic solution would better deal with that kind
of crap.
I'll post a review once I'm done with Eric's patchset; hopefully tonight or
tomorrow morning.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists