[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVmviT=upxHfPfmLy2aUOKdCuCbNg9WZQcx6f=8T8vv=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:22:28 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>, Andrew Honig <ahonig@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] random,x86,kvm: Rework arch RNG seeds and get some
from kvm
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:11:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> What's the status of this series? I assume that it's too late for at
>> least patches 2-5 to make it into 3.17.
>
> Which tree were you hoping this patch series to go through? I was
> assuming it would go through the x86 tree since the bulk of the
> changes in the x86 subsystem (hence my Acked-by).
There's some argument that patch 1 should go through the kvm tree.
There's no real need for patch 1 and 2-5 to end up in the same kernel
release, either.
>
> IIRC, Peter had some concerns, and I don't remember if they were all
> addressed. Peter?
>
I don't know. I rewrite one thing he didn't like and undid the other,
but there's plenty of opportunity for this version to be problematic, too.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists