[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrmq83pTCgUu2gR8spAYJPBgTx16JTQ++PKT7-zYjw6jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 22:15:35 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Apelete Seketeli <apelete@...eteli.net>
Cc: Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>,
Alex Smith <alex.smith@...tec.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] mmc: jz4740: prepare next dma transfer in parallel
with current transfer
On 12 August 2014 20:10, Apelete Seketeli <apelete@...eteli.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug-12-2014 at 06:22:04 PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 21 July 2014 06:37, Apelete Seketeli <apelete@...eteli.net> wrote:
>> > Make use of the MMC asynchronous request capability to prepare the
>> > next DMA transfer request in parallel with the current transfer.
>> > This is done by adding pre-request and post-request callbacks that are
>> > used by the MMC framework during an active data transfer.
>> >
>> > It should help reduce the impact of DMA preparation overhead on the SD
>> > card performance.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Apelete Seketeli <apelete@...eteli.net>
>>
>> Thanks! Queued for 3.18.
>
> W00t \o/ <-- hacker joy. Thank you :).
>
> Just out of curiosity, why not pulling these for 3.17 ?
I have had a vacation period. Since these are quite big changes, I
think they deserve some testing in linux-next and did not want to pull
in some late changes for 3.17.
Kind regards
Uffe
>
> Cheers.
> --
> Apelete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists