[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140812235756.GA22698@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:57:56 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/16] RCU-tasks implementation
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:48:40PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This series provides v5 of a prototype of an RCU-tasks implementation,
> which has been requested to assist with tramopoline removal. This flavor
> of RCU is task-based rather than CPU-based, and has voluntary context
> switch, usermode execution, and the idle loops as its only quiescent
> states. This selection of quiescent states ensures that at the end
> of a grace period, there will no longer be any tasks depending on a
> trampoline that was removed before the beginning of that grace period.
> This works because such trampolines do not contain function calls,
> do not contain voluntary context switches, do not switch to usermode,
> and do not switch to idle.
[ . . . ]
> o There are probably still bugs.
And there probably are, but this version passes 10-hour rcutorture tests
in a few configurations, so getting reasonably robust.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists