[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53EAFCED.8030206@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:51:41 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: Fix probing the kernel API with cpu-wide
events
On 08/13/2014 08:37 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:04:30 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Fall back to probing with the current pid if cpu-wide
>> probing fails. This primarily affects the setting of
>> comm_exec flag when the user is un-privileged and
>> /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid > 0. The change
>> to comm_exec can be observed by using -vv with
>> perf record and a kernel that supports comm_exec.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something - why not just try process-wide probing in
> the first place?
Same reason as patch 4 i.e. to avoid a jump label change when doing
system-wide tracing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists