[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140813081017.GA9918@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:10:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST workarounds
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 06:45:15PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> On Broadwell INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST cannot be used with any period
> that doesn't have the lowest 6 bits cleared. And the period
> should not be smaller than 128.
>
> Add a new callback to enforce this, and set it for Broadwell.
>
> This is erratum BDM57 and BDM11.
Urgh, this blows.
> +/*
> + * Broadwell:
> + * The INST_RETIRED.ALL period always needs to have lowest
> + * 6bits cleared (BDM57). It shall not use a period smaller
> + * than 100 (BDM11). We combine the two to enforce
> + * a min-period of 128.
> + */
> +static unsigned bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, unsigned left)
> +{
> + if ((event->hw.config & 0xffff) == 0x1c0) {
ISTR we have actual proper defines for that.
> + if (left < 128)
> + left = 128;
> + left &= ~0x3fu;
> + }
> + return left;
> +}
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists