linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make bind_interdomain_evtchn_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53EB35F1.6000208@citrix.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:54:57 +0100
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irq() public

On 13/08/14 10:43, Juergen Gross wrote:
> 
> static int scsiback_init_sring(struct vscsibk_info *info, grant_ref_t
> ring_ref,
>                         evtchn_port_t evtchn)
> {
> ...
>         irq = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irq(info->domid, evtchn);
>         request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, scsiback_irq_fn,
>                              IRQF_ONESHOT, "vscsiif-backend", info)
> ...

This usage is fine.

I assume the error checking of bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irq() and
request_threaded_irq() was omitted for clarity in this example?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/