linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 2/7] regulator: core: factor out delay function from _regulator_do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1407929624-8737-3-git-send-email-guodong.xu@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:33:39 +0800
From:	Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>
To:	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	lee.jones@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, khilman@...aro.org,
	haojian.zhuang@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/7] regulator: core: factor out delay function from _regulator_do_enable

A common delay function can be helpful when implementing new features. Factor
it out to maximize code reusability.

Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index eb6f172..67d4246 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1753,6 +1753,45 @@ static int regulator_ena_gpio_ctrl(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * _regulator_enable_delay - a delay helper function
+ * @delay: time to delay in microseconds
+ *
+ * Delay for the requested amount of time as per the guidelines in:
+ *
+ *     Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt
+ *
+ * The assumption here is that regulators will never be enabled in
+ * atomic context and therefore sleeping functions can be used.
+ */
+static void _regulator_enable_delay(unsigned int delay)
+{
+	unsigned int ms = delay / 1000;
+	unsigned int us = delay % 1000;
+
+	if (ms > 0) {
+		/*
+		 * For small enough values, handle super-millisecond
+		 * delays in the usleep_range() call below.
+		 */
+		if (ms < 20)
+			us += ms * 1000;
+		else
+			msleep(ms);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Give the scheduler some room to coalesce with any other
+	 * wakeup sources. For delays shorter than 10 us, don't even
+	 * bother setting up high-resolution timers and just busy-
+	 * loop.
+	 */
+	if (us >= 10)
+		usleep_range(us, us + 100);
+	else
+		udelay(us);
+}
+
 static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	int ret, delay;
@@ -1786,40 +1825,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	 * together.  */
 	trace_regulator_enable_delay(rdev_get_name(rdev));
 
-	/*
-	 * Delay for the requested amount of time as per the guidelines in:
-	 *
-	 *     Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt
-	 *
-	 * The assumption here is that regulators will never be enabled in
-	 * atomic context and therefore sleeping functions can be used.
-	 */
-	if (delay) {
-		unsigned int ms = delay / 1000;
-		unsigned int us = delay % 1000;
-
-		if (ms > 0) {
-			/*
-			 * For small enough values, handle super-millisecond
-			 * delays in the usleep_range() call below.
-			 */
-			if (ms < 20)
-				us += ms * 1000;
-			else
-				msleep(ms);
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Give the scheduler some room to coalesce with any other
-		 * wakeup sources. For delays shorter than 10 us, don't even
-		 * bother setting up high-resolution timers and just busy-
-		 * loop.
-		 */
-		if (us >= 10)
-			usleep_range(us, us + 100);
-		else
-			udelay(us);
-	}
+	_regulator_enable_delay(delay);
 
 	trace_regulator_enable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/