linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: wm8994: declare dc servo register for wm8958 as volatile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:32:32 +0100
From:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Nikesh Oswal <nikesh@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, tiwai@...e.de,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: wm8994: declare dc servo register for wm8958 as
	volatile

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:13:38PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:46:25AM +0100, Nikesh Oswal wrote:
> > DC Servo register 57h holds the DC offset value after the hardware has
> > completed the DC Servo Correction, so declare this register as volatile
> > because it is changed by the hardware.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nikesh Oswal <nikesh@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c          |    1 +
> >  include/linux/mfd/wm8994/registers.h |    1 +
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c
> > index 2fbce9c..e775565 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c
> > @@ -1169,6 +1169,7 @@ static bool wm8958_volatile_register(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> >  	case WM8958_FW_MINOR_0:
> >  	case WM8958_FW_PATCH_1:
> >  	case WM8958_FW_PATCH_0:
> > +	case WM8958_DC_SERVO:
> 
> I think you can just use the WM8994_DC_SERVO_4 define the
> register is called DC Servo (4) in the datasheet.
> 
> Also would it be worth adding DC_SERVO_1 and DC_SERVO_READBACK as
> they are being treated as volatile on 8994 and look identical in
> the datasheet.

Sorry missed the call to wm8994_volatile_register ignore this
second comment here.

Thanks,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/