[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53EB746E.1020904@hitachi.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:21:34 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Naohiro Aota <naota@...sp.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [BUGFIX] perf probe: Fix --list option to show events
only with uprobe events
(2014/08/13 14:22), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:50:55 +0000, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> + if (kp_fd < 0 && up_fd < 0) {
>> + /* Both kprobes and uprobes are disabled, warn it. */
>> + if (kp_fd == -ENOTSUP && up_fd == -ENOTSUP)
>> + pr_warning("Debugfs is not mounted.\n");
>> + else if (kp_fd == -ENOENT && up_fd == -ENOENT)
>> + pr_warning("Please rebuild kernel with "
>> + "CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS or/and "
>> + "CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS.\n");
>> + else
>> + pr_warning("Failed to open kprobe events: %s.\n" \
>> + "Failed to open uprobe events: %s.\n",
>> + strerror(-kp_fd), strerror(-up_fd));
>
> It seems the second strerror() might overwrite the message of the
> first. You'd better using strerror_r() IMHO.
Oops, right, it must use the same buffer...
But instead of using strerror_r, we can call pr_warning twice. Or should we
better replace all strerror to strerror_r in perf? (it should be another series)
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists