[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53EB959B.5090003@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:43:07 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix sighand use after free
On 08/13/2014 12:19 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/13, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>> On 08/13/2014 11:58 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> On 08/13, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ void __cleanup_sighand(struct sighand_struct *sighand)
>>>> {
>>>> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sighand->count)) {
>>>> signalfd_cleanup(sighand);
>>>> - kmem_cache_free(sighand_cachep, sighand);
>>>> + rcu_free(sighand_cachep, sighand);
>>>
>>> Please note that sighand_cachep is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.
>>
>> SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU means that the slab page is not given
>> back to the system until after the RCU grace period has
>> expired.
>>
>> However, the objects inside the slab can still be reused
>> immediately!
>
> Yes. This is fine. This memory won't be returned to system before rcu
> gp pass, and this memory is still "struct sighand_struct" with the
> properly initialized ->siglock (note the sighand_ctor()).
Fair enough, you are right.
The sighand_ctor does prevent any issues.
The slub code also prevents slubs with constructor
functions from ever getting merged, so this is all
taken care of.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists