[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140813192010.GK17528@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:20:10 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@...il.com>,
"Chew, Chiau Ee" <chiau.ee.chew@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"chiauee85@...il.com" <chiauee85@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Add common clock framework support in
PCI glue layer
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:59:14AM +0000, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > Any idea what happened to this patch? I didn't find it in linux-next and it
> > looks like it is not merged with mainline either.
> Would like to follow up with you about this patch. Do you have plan to merge it in ?
>
Please don't send contentless pings, it just adds to the amount of mail
that needs reading. Since I don't want to encourage people to do this I
tend to respond to contentless pings by delaying things, otherwise I
might give the impression that it's a good idea (and the "oh, I did
something with that" that comes from deleting the nag makes that happen
subconsciously anyway).
Please also allow a reasonable time for review, less than two weeks (to
when Mika first nagged) is a bit aggressive for something that isn't an
urgent bug fix. People might take vacation or just be busy.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists