linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Remove architecture dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 03:51:43 +0530
From:	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
Cc:	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Remove architecture dependency

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Andrew Bresticker
<abrestic@...omium.org> wrote:
> The dw_mmc host may also be present on non-ARC/ARM SoCs (e.g. MIPS)
> and the driver itself does not appear to depend on any particular
> architecture(s).
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> index a565254..15b110a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> @@ -563,7 +563,6 @@ config SDH_BFIN_MISSING_CMD_PULLUP_WORKAROUND
>
>  config MMC_DW
>         tristate "Synopsys DesignWare Memory Card Interface"
> -       depends on ARC || ARM

I am not sure if just removing _depends_ is good vs adding another
architecture(s) dependency here.
There are n number of places in Kconfig where this _depends_ runs up
to well over 10 entries.
What about config like MMC_DW_EXYNOS and MMC_DW_K3 which depends on
MMC_DW? Is it ok to expose them as well for architectures which might
not contains these variants?

One way I found this useful, one need not worry about finding MMC_DW
in there arch default menu-config, this will just appear, go and
select it.

Lets see what others think about this.

>         help
>           This selects support for the Synopsys DesignWare Mobile Storage IP
>           block, this provides host support for SD and MMC interfaces, in both
> --
> 2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Regards,
Alim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/