linux-kernel - x86, MCE: MCE event ring management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1407998986-1834-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 02:49:41 -0400
From:	"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	bp@...en8.de
Cc:	tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: x86, MCE: MCE event ring management

We have too many rings for different H/W error events management.
All of them can be merged into one kind of unified mechanism.
Furthermore, this management mechanism should be reliable enough
even in MCE context to avoid deadlock like calling printk in MCE
context. This patch series is used for this purpose.

[PATCH v2 1/5] x86, MCE: Provide a lock-less memory pool to save
[PATCH v2 2/5] x86, MCE: Don't use percpu for MCE workqueue/irq_work
[PATCH v2 3/5] x86, MCE: Remove mce_ring for SRAO error
[PATCH v2 4/5] x86/mce: Simplify flow when handling recoverable
[PATCH v2 5/5] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/