linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: Fix memory corruption by ulist_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:54:31 +0200
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc:	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: Fix memory corruption by ulist_add_merge() on 32bit arch

At Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:39:11 -0400,
Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/06/2014 11:14 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I meant that I don't care how you do it, if you want to do it the simple way
> >>> first and then send the cleanup later thats fine by me.  Thanks,
> >>
> >> Ah, misunderstood.  Then please disregard my v2 patches and take just
> >> v1 patch.  It's even good for 3.16, if possible.
> >>
> >> I'll send the cleanup patch on top of that.
> > 
> > Ping.  I don't want to play a bot, but slowly wondering what's going
> > on...
> 
> Sorry for the delay Takashi.  This patch is a ';' away from compiling.
> I've fixed it up here and I'm running tests, but I wanted to double
> check this was the latest version.

Yes, the first version (posted on July 28) is the right patch.
(Sorry for the missing ";", I thought I did build test on both
 architectures.)


thanks,

Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/