lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:03:02 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To:	Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, santoshsy@...il.com,
	linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org, subhashj@...eaurora.org,
	noag@...eaurora.org, draviv@...eaurora.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@...eaurora.org>,
	Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scsi: ufs-msm: add UFS controller support for Qualcomm MSM chips


On Aug 14, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org> wrote:

> The files in this change implement the UFS HW (controller & PHY) specific
> behavior in Qualcomm MSM chips.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-msm.txt  |   37 +
> .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt      |    4 +
> drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig                           |   12 +
> drivers/scsi/ufs/Makefile                          |    4 +
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy-qmp-20nm.c            |  254 +++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy-qmp-20nm.h            |  216 ++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy-qmp-28nm.c            |  368 +++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy-qmp-28nm.h            |  735 +++++++++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy.c                     |  646 ++++++++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy.h                     |  193 ++++

Any reason not to put the phy driver in drivers/phy ?

> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm.c                         | 1105 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm.h                         |  158 +++
> 12 files changed, 3732 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-msm.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy-qmp-20nm.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy-qmp-20nm.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy-qmp-28nm.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy-qmp-28nm.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm-phy.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-msm.h

Seems like we should spit this into two patches, one for the phy and one for the UFS driver itself.  Maybe even three, one for the 20nm phy, one for the 28nm phy, and one for ufs-msm.c,h.

> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-msm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-msm.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b5caace
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-msm.txt

This should probably be bindings/phy/qcom-ufs-phy.txt

> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +* MSM Universal Flash Storage (UFS) PHY
> +
> +UFSPHY nodes are defined to describe on-chip UFS PHY hardware macro.
> +Each UFS PHY node should have its own node.
> +
> +To bind UFS PHY with UFS host controller, the controller node should
> +contain a phandle reference to UFS PHY node.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible        : compatible list, contains "qcom,ufs-msm-phy-qmp-28nm"
> +                      or "qcom,ufs-msm-phy-qmp-20nm" according to the relevant
> +                      phy in use

Do we really need ‘-msm’ in the compat name?

> +- reg               : <registers mapping>
> +- #phy-cells         : This property shall be set to 0
> +- vdda-phy-supply   : phandle to main PHY supply for analog domain
> +- vdda-pll-supply   : phandle to PHY PLL and Power-Gen block power supply
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- vdda-phy-max-microamp : specifies max. load that can be drawn from phy supply
> +- vdda-pll-max-microamp : specifies max. load that can be drawn from pll supply
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +	ufsphy1: ufsphy@...c597000 {
> +		compatible = "qcom,ufs-msm-phy-qmp-28nm";
> +		reg = <0xfc597000 0x800>;
> +		#phy-cells = <0>;
> +		vdda-phy-supply = <&pma8084_l4>;
> +		vdda-pll-supply = <&pma8084_l12>;
> +		vdda-phy-max-microamp = <50000>;
> +		vdda-pll-max-microamp = <1000>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ufshc@...c598000 {
> +		...
> +		phys = <&ufsphy1>;
> +	};
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> index e73a619..378585c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ Required properties:
> - reg               : <registers mapping>
> 
> Optional properties:
> +- phys			: phandle to UFS PHY node
> +- phy-names		: the string "ufs_msm_phy" when is found in a node, along
> +			  with "phys" attribute, provides phandle to UFS PHY node

seems like the phy-names should be more generic like “ufsphy"

> - vcc-supply            : phandle to VCC supply regulator node
> - vccq-supply           : phandle to VCCQ supply regulator node
> - vccq2-supply          : phandle to VCCQ2 supply regulator node
> @@ -39,6 +42,7 @@ Example:
> 		reg = <0xfc598000 0x800>;
> 		interrupts = <0 28 0>;
> 
> +		ufs-phy = <&ufsphy>;
> 		vcc-supply = <&xxx_reg1>;
> 		vcc-supply-1p8;
> 		vccq-supply = <&xxx_reg2>;


> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> index 6e07b2a..a8259e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> @@ -70,3 +70,15 @@ config SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM
> 	If you have a controller with this interface, say Y or M here.
> 
> 	  If unsure, say N.
> +
> +config SCSI_UFS_MSM
> +	bool "MSM specific hooks to UFS controller platform driver"
> +	depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM && ARCH_MSM

This should probably be ARCH_QCOM instead of ARCH_MSM

> +	help
> +	  This selects the MSM specific additions to UFSHCD platform driver.
> +	  UFS host on MSM needs some vendor specific configuration before
> +	  accessing the hardware which includes PHY configuration and vendor
> +	  specific registers.
> +
> +	  Select this if you have UFS controller on MSM chipset.
> +	  If unsure, say N.

[ snip ]

- k
-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ