lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFdhcLQ11MnF7Py+X1wrJMiu0L15-JrV883oYGopdz1oag0njQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:32:36 -0400 From: David Horner <ds2horner@...il.com> To: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>, juno.choi@....com, seungho1.park@....com, Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...gle.com>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] zram: add mem_used_max via sysfs On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote: >> - if (zram->limit_bytes && >> - zs_get_total_size_bytes(meta->mem_pool) > zram->limit_bytes) { >> + total_bytes = zs_get_total_size_bytes(meta->mem_pool); >> + if (zram->limit_bytes && total_bytes > zram->limit_bytes) { > > do you need to take the init_lock to read limit_bytes here? It could > be getting changed between these checks... There is no real danger in freeing with an error. It is more timing than a race. The max calculation is still ok because committed allocations are added atomically. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists