linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 tip/core/rcu 06/16] rcutorture: Add torture tests for RCU-tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:44:15 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 tip/core/rcu 06/16] rcutorture: Add torture tests for
 RCU-tasks

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 05:34:53PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > This commit adds torture tests for RCU-tasks.  It also fixes a bug that
> > would segfault for an RCU flavor lacking a callback-barrier function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/rcupdate.h |  1 +
> >  kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c  | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > index e6aea256ad39..f504f797c9c8 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ enum rcutorture_type {
> >         RCU_FLAVOR,
> >         RCU_BH_FLAVOR,
> >         RCU_SCHED_FLAVOR,
> > +       RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
> >         SRCU_FLAVOR,
> >         INVALID_RCU_FLAVOR
> >  };
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> > index febe07062ac5..52423f2c74da 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> > @@ -601,6 +601,52 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops sched_ops = {
> >         .name           = "sched"
> >  };
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Definitions for RCU-tasks torture testing.
> > + */
> > +
> > +static int tasks_torture_read_lock(void)
> > +{
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void tasks_torture_read_unlock(int idx)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rcu_tasks_torture_deferred_free(struct rcu_torture *p)
> > +{
> > +       call_rcu_tasks(&p->rtort_rcu, rcu_torture_cb);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct rcu_torture_ops tasks_ops = {
> > +       .ttype          = RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
> > +       .init           = rcu_sync_torture_init,
> > +       .readlock       = tasks_torture_read_lock,
> > +       .read_delay     = rcu_read_delay,  /* just reuse rcu's version. */
> > +       .readunlock     = tasks_torture_read_unlock,
> > +       .completed      = rcu_no_completed,
> > +       .deferred_free  = rcu_tasks_torture_deferred_free,
> > +       .sync           = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> > +       .exp_sync       = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> > +       .call           = call_rcu_tasks,
> > +       .cb_barrier     = rcu_barrier_tasks,
> > +       .fqs            = NULL,
> > +       .stats          = NULL,
> > +       .irq_capable    = 1,
> > +       .name           = "tasks"
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define RCUTORTURE_TASKS_OPS &tasks_ops,
> 
> Not sure about the comma here, no harm but still... a minor nit :)

Good point, it would be better to parenthesize this an put the comma
at the point of use.  Fixed!

							Thanx, Paul

> > +
> > +#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
> > +
> > +#define RCUTORTURE_TASKS_OPS
> > +
> > +#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * RCU torture priority-boost testing.  Runs one real-time thread per
> >   * CPU for moderate bursts, repeatedly registering RCU callbacks and
> > @@ -1295,7 +1341,8 @@ static int rcu_torture_barrier_cbs(void *arg)
> >                 if (atomic_dec_and_test(&barrier_cbs_count))
> >                         wake_up(&barrier_wq);
> >         } while (!torture_must_stop());
> > -       cur_ops->cb_barrier();
> > +       if (cur_ops->cb_barrier != NULL)
> > +               cur_ops->cb_barrier();
> >         destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rcu);
> >         torture_kthread_stopping("rcu_torture_barrier_cbs");
> >         return 0;
> > @@ -1534,6 +1581,7 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
> >         int firsterr = 0;
> >         static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] = {
> >                 &rcu_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_busted_ops, &srcu_ops, &sched_ops,
> > +               RCUTORTURE_TASKS_OPS
> >         };
> >
> >         if (!torture_init_begin(torture_type, verbose, &rcutorture_runnable))
> > --
> > 1.8.1.5
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pranith
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/