lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:45:39 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] sb_edac: i2c_imc staging submission prep

I'd like to submit my i2c_imc driver to -staging, but the sb_edac
driver is currently squatting on my pci id :) sb_edac is a strange
beast: it uses registers from several PCI devcies, but the one that
it registers with the driver core is the SMBUS controller.

This trivial series moves sb_edac's PCI ids to pci_ids.h (they're
not exclusive to the EDAC hardware) and changes the PCI ID that is
used to detect the EDAC hardware.

I think that i2c_imc is a good staging candidate: the driver is IMO
quite clean, the hardware is very common, and I know of some users
(unrelated to me!) that use it for development, but it's not yet
acceptable as a real driver.  In particular, it needs confirmation
from Intel as to whether it handshakes correctly with BIOS.  In the
mean time, it's perfectly safe to use *if you know that your system
isn't doing something special with its DIMM SMBUS registers*.

I have reason to believe that I may be able to get a information
or a review from the right people at Intel in a couple of months,
and I suspect that some people in the NV-DIMM community would be
interested in this stuff.

I realize that the timing is a bit awkward here.  These patches have
been floating around for almost a year.  I'd be okay with them going
in for 3.17 or 3.18.  If I understand correctly, the deadline for
staging drivers is much later than the merge window, but I don't
want to submit the i2c_imc driver itself to staging until these prep
patches are in.

Andy Lutomirski (2):
  Move Intel SNB device ids from sb_edac to pci_ids.h
  sb_edac: Claim a different PCI device

 drivers/edac/sb_edac.c  | 32 +-------------------------------
 include/linux/pci_ids.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ