[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53EDDC6B.40007@bjorling.me>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 12:09:47 +0200
From: Matias Bjorling <m@...rling.me>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
"Sam Bradshaw (sbradshaw)" <sbradshaw@...ron.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Rob Nelson <rlnelson@...gle.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] NVMe: Convert to blk-mq
On 08/15/2014 01:09 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
>
> The allocation and freeing of blk-mq parts seems a bit asymmetrical
> to me. The 'tags' belong to the tagset, but any request_queue using
> that tagset may free the tags. I looked to separate the tag allocation
> concerns, but that's more time than I have, so this is my quick-fix
> driver patch, forcing tag access through the hw_ctx.
>
I moved nvmeq->hctx->tags into nvmeq->tags in the last version. I missed
the free's in blk_mq_map_swqueue. Good catch.
The previous method might have another problem. If there's two
namespaces, sharing tag set. The hctx_init fn could be called with
different hctx for an nvmeq, leading to false tag sharing between nvme
queues.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists