| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1408074008-4357-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 11:40:08 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: mst@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] vhost_net: stop rx net polling when possible
After rx vq was enabled, we never stop polling its socket. This is sub optimal
when may lead unnecessary wake-ups after the rx net work has already been
queued. This could be optimized by stopping polling the rx net sock when
processing both rx and tx and restart it afterward. This could save unnecessary
wake-ups and even unnecessary spin locks acquiring with the help of commit
9e641bdcfa4ef4d6e2fbaa59c1be0ad5d1551fd5 "net-tun: restructure tun_do_read for
better sleep/wakeup efficiency".
Test shows significant CPU% savings during almost all the cases:
Guest rx stream:
size(B)/sessions/throughput/cpu/normalized thru/
64/1/+0.7773% -8.6224% +10.2866%
64/2/+0.6335% -13.9109% +16.8946%
64/4/-0.8182% -14.8336% +16.4565%
64/8/+0.4830% -13.7675% +16.5256%
256/1/-7.0963% -12.6880% +6.4043%
256/2/-1.3982% -11.5424% +11.4678%
256/4/-0.0350% -11.8323% +13.3806%
256/8/-1.5830% -12.7693% +12.8238%
1024/1/-7.4895% -19.1449% +14.4152%
1024/2/-7.4575% -19.4018% +14.8195%
1024/4/-0.3881% -9.1183% +9.6061%
1024/8/+0.4713% -11.0155% +12.9087%
4096/1/+0.8786% -8.4050% +10.1355%
4096/2/+0.0098% -15.3094% +18.0885%
4096/4/+0.0445% -10.8247% +12.1886%
4096/8/-2.1317% -12.5111% +11.8637%
16384/1/-0.0008% -6.1891% +6.5966%
16384/2/-0.0117% -16.2716% +19.4198%
16384/4/+0.0001% -5.9197% +6.2923%
16384/8/+0.0173% -7.6681% +8.3236%
65535/1/+0.0011% -10.3594% +11.5578%
65535/2/-0.4108% -14.4304% +16.3838%
65535/4/+0.0011% -10.3594% +11.5578%
65535/8/-0.4108% -14.4304% +16.3838%
Guest tx stream:
size(B)/sessions/throughput/cpu/normalized thru/
64/1/-0.6228% -2.1936% +1.6060%
64/2/+0.8646% -3.5063% +4.5297%
64/4/+0.8733% -3.2495% +4.2613%
64/8/+1.4290% -3.5593% +5.1724%
256/1/+7.2098% -3.1122% +10.6535%
256/2/-10.1408% -6.8230% -3.5607%
256/4/-11.3531% -6.7085% -4.9785%
256/8/-10.2723% -6.5628% -3.9701%
1024/1/-18.9329% -13.6162% -6.1547%
1024/2/-0.3728% -1.3181% +0.9580%
1024/4/+0.0125% -3.6338% +3.7838%
1024/8/-0.0030% -2.7282% +2.8017%
4096/1/+16.9367% -1.9435% +19.2543%
4096/2/+0.0121% -6.1682% +6.5866%
4096/4/+0.0019% -3.8510% +4.0072%
4096/8/-0.0222% -4.1368% +4.2922%
16384/1/-0.0026% -8.6892% +9.5132%
16384/2/-0.0012% -10.1676% +11.3171%
16384/4/+0.0196% -1.2551% +1.2908%
16384/8/+0.1303% -3.2634% +3.5082%
65535/1/+0.0019% -3.4694% +3.5961%
65535/2/-0.0003% -0.7635% +0.7690%
65535/4/-0.0219% -2.7875% +2.8448%
65535/8/+0.1137% -2.7922% +2.9894%
TCP_RR:
size(B)/sessions/throughput/cpu/normalized thru/
256/1/+1.9004% -4.7985% +7.0366%
256/25/-4.7366% -11.0809% +7.1349%
256/50/+3.9808% -5.2037% +9.6887%
4096/1/+2.1619% -0.7303% +2.9134%
4096/25/-13.1836% -14.7298% +1.8134%
4096/50/-11.1990% -15.4763% +5.0605%
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 8dae2f7..d4a9742 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -334,6 +334,8 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, bool success)
static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
{
struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
+ struct vhost_virtqueue *rx_vq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX].vq;
+ struct vhost_poll *rx_poll = &net->poll[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
unsigned out, in, s;
int head;
@@ -348,15 +350,18 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
size_t len, total_len = 0;
int err;
size_t hdr_size;
- struct socket *sock;
+ struct socket *sock, *rxsock;
struct vhost_net_ubuf_ref *uninitialized_var(ubufs);
- bool zcopy, zcopy_used;
+ bool zcopy, zcopy_used, poll = false;
mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&rx_vq->mutex);
sock = vq->private_data;
+ rxsock = rx_vq->private_data;
if (!sock)
goto out;
+ vhost_poll_stop(rx_poll);
vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
hdr_size = nvq->vhost_hlen;
@@ -451,11 +456,17 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
total_len += len;
vhost_net_tx_packet(net);
if (unlikely(total_len >= VHOST_NET_WEIGHT)) {
- vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+ poll = true;
break;
}
}
+
+ if (rxsock)
+ vhost_poll_start(rx_poll, rxsock->file);
+ if (poll)
+ vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
out:
+ mutex_unlock(&rx_vq->mutex);
mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
}
@@ -554,6 +565,7 @@ err:
static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
{
struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
+ struct vhost_poll *poll = &net->poll[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
unsigned uninitialized_var(in), log;
struct vhost_log *vq_log;
@@ -580,6 +592,8 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
sock = vq->private_data;
if (!sock)
goto out;
+
+ vhost_poll_stop(poll);
vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
vhost_hlen = nvq->vhost_hlen;
@@ -660,10 +674,12 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
vhost_log_write(vq, vq_log, log, vhost_len);
total_len += vhost_len;
if (unlikely(total_len >= VHOST_NET_WEIGHT)) {
- vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
- break;
+ vhost_poll_queue(poll);
+ goto out;
}
}
+
+ vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file);
out:
mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists