linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: libcfs: workitem.c: Cleaning up missing null-terminate after strncpy call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLPUZaooSD6yH3zJSW1jmA-kCT204X3indf7JRd5mAuyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Aug 2014 16:39:46 -0500
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>,
	Masanari Iida <standby24x7@...il.com>,
	Mike Sampson <mike@...bodata.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: libcfs: workitem.c: Cleaning up
 missing null-terminate after strncpy call

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
<rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se> wrote:
> 2014-08-12 16:58 GMT+02:00 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>:
>> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
>> <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se> wrote:
>>> Added a guaranteed null-terminate after call to strncpy.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/workitem.c |    1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/workitem.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/workitem.c
>>> index 0a03bf7..60326f2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/workitem.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/workitem.c
>>> @@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ cfs_wi_sched_create(char *name, struct cfs_cpt_table *cptab,
>>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>>         strncpy(sched->ws_name, name, CFS_WS_NAME_LEN);
>>> +       sched->ws_name[CFS_WS_NAME_LEN - 1] = '\0';
>>>         sched->ws_cptab = cptab;
>>>         sched->ws_cpt = cpt;
>>
>> This seems like a place for strlcpy instead?
>>
>> -Kees
>>
>> --
>> Kees Cook
>> Chrome OS Security
>
> Hi Kees
>
> Sure, strlcpy is preferable in many ways if we only can guarantee that
> it is safe.
> I have seldom received so much criticism when I start switching to
> strlcpy, although much of it was justified :)
> Even Linus was getting into the debate.  See more:
>
> https://plus.google.com/111049168280159033135/posts/1amLbuhWbh5
>
>
> I do this only when I'm sure it will not cause any other problems.
> But if you or anyone else can guarantee that in this case, so I'd make
> a new patch with strlcpy.

Ah right, yeah, that limitation is weird. In that case, for your original patch:

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-Kees


-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/