[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1408174826.5575.33.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:40:26 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] locking/rwsem: more aggressive use of optimistic
spinning
On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 13:58 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Thank for the testing recipe. I am afraid that I can't find a 500TB SSD
> for testing purpose. Do you think the test will still be valid for
> exercising rwsem if I use a smaller SSD or maybe mechanical hard disk?
I suspect fs_mark will fit in less than a cubic meter of silicon. You
definitely don't want to use a 400GB USB2 drive to find out though.
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
0 800000 0 22474.9 5551907
0 1600000 0 1550.0 314304154
0 2400000 0 832.3 928216719
zzzzz... nope, nobody is _that_ bored ^C
(starts xfs_repair, perf top.. snort)
Nope, you definitely don't want USB2 crapware for that either :)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists