Date:	Sun, 17 Aug 2014 08:59:33 +0200
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
	Pierre Fersing <pierre-fersing@...rref.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>,
	Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@...gotech.com>,
	Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoorthy@...gotech.com>,
	Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...gotech.com>,
	Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.mahajan@...gotech.com>,
	Hariprasad S <hariprasad@...lsio.com>,
	Santosh Rastapur <santosh@...lsio.com>,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...gotech.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] init / kthread: add module_long_probe_init()	and module_long_probe_exit()

At Sat, 16 Aug 2014 04:50:07 +0200,
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 04:39:02PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 08/15, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:51:01PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > On 08/12, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +/* To be used by modules which can take over 30 seconds at probe */
> > > >
> > > > Probably the comment should explain that this hack should only be
> > > > used if the driver is buggy and is wating for "real fix".
> > > >
> > > > > +#define module_long_probe_init(initfn)				\
> > > > > +	static struct task_struct *__init_thread;		\
> > > > > +	static int _long_probe_##initfn(void *arg)		\
> > > > > +	{							\
> > > > > +		return initfn();				\
> > > > > +	}							\
> > > > > +	static inline __init int __long_probe_##initfn(void)	\
> > > > > +	{							\
> > > > > +		__init_thread = kthread_run(_long_probe_##initfn,\
> > > > > +					    NULL,		\
> > > > > +					    #initfn);		\
> > > > > +		if (IS_ERR(__init_thread))			\
> > > > > +			return PTR_ERR(__init_thread);		\
> > > > > +		return 0;					\
> > > > > +	}							\
> > > > > +	module_init(__long_probe_##initfn);
> > > > > +/* To be used by modules that require module_long_probe_init() */
> > > > > +#define module_long_probe_exit(exitfn)				\
> > > > > +	static inline void __long_probe_##exitfn(void)		\
> > > > > +	{							\
> > > > > +		exitfn();					\
> > > > > +		if (__init_thread)				\
> > > > > +			kthread_stop(__init_thread);		\
> > > > > +	}							\
> > > >
> > > > exitfn() should be called after kthread_stop(), and only if initfn()
> > > > returns 0. So it should probably do
> > > >
> > > > 	int err = kthread_stop(__init_thread);
> > > > 	if (!err)
> > > > 		exitfn();
> > >
> > > Thanks! With the check for __init_thread as well as it can be
> > > ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM), ERR_PTR(-EINTR), or NULL (for whatever other
> > > reason).
> > 
> > Do you mean __long_probe_##exitfn() should also check ERR_PTR(__init_thread)?
> > I don't think so. If kthread_run() above fails, module_init() should return
> > the error (it does), so module_exit() won't be called.
> 
> Good point.
> 
> > > > But there is an additional complication, you can't use __init_thread
> > > > without get_task_struct(),
> > >
> > > Can you elaborate why ? kthread_stop() uses get_task_struct(),
> > 
> > This is too late. This task_struct can be already freed/reused. See below.
> > 
> > > wake_up_process() and finally put_task_struct(), and we're the
> > > only user of this thread. Also kthread_run() ensures wake_up_process()
> > > gets called on startup, so not sure where the race would be provided
> > > all users here and with the respective helpers on buggy drivers.
> > >
> > > > so  __long_probe_##initfn() can't use
> > > > kthread_run(). It needs kthread_create() + get_task_struct() + wakeup.
> > >
> > > I fail to see why we'd need to add get_task_struct() on
> > > module_long_probe_init(), can you clarify?
> > 
> > kthread_stop(kthread_run(callback)) is only safe if callback() can not exit
> > on its own, without checking kthread_should_stop(). And btw that is why
> > kthread_stop() does get_task_struct()).
> > 
> > If callback() can exit (if it calls do_exit() or simply returns), then nothing
> > protects this task_struct, it will be freed.
> 
> OK thanks, yeah I see the issue now, and I was able to create a null
> pointer dereference by simply calling schedule() quite a bit, will
> roll in the required fixes, but come to think of it if there are
> other uses (I haven't SmPLd grep'd for grammar uses yet) perhaps
> generic helpers would be good? kthread_run_alloc() kthread_run_free().

How about just increasing/decreasing the module count for blocking the
exit call?  For example:

#define module_long_probe_init(initfn)				\
	static int _long_probe_##initfn(void *arg)		\
	{							\
		int ret = initfn();				\
		module_put(THIS_MODULE);			\
		return ret;					\
	}							\
	static inline __init int __long_probe_##initfn(void)	\
	{							\
		struct task_struct *__init_thread;		\
		__module_get(THIS_MODULE);			\
		__init_thread = kthread_run(_long_probe_##initfn,\
					    NULL,		\
					    #initfn);		\
		if (IS_ERR(__init_thread)) {			\
			module_put(THIS_MODULE);		\
			return PTR_ERR(__init_thread);		\
		}						\
		return 0;					\
	}							\
	module_init(__long_probe_##initfn);
/* To be used by modules that require module_long_probe_init() */
#define module_long_probe_exit(exitfn)				\
	module_exit(exitfn);



Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists