lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:06:46 +0200
From:	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
CC:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI: Add GPIO-signaled event simulator.

On 08.08.2014 14:36, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Tomasz Nowicki
> <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> GPIO signaled events is quite new thing in Linux kernel.
>> AFAIK, there are not many board which can take advantage of it.
>> However, GPIO events are very useful feature during work on ACPI
>> subsystems.
>
> Overall this seems like a pretty nice debug feature.
>
>> This commit emulates GPIO h/w behaviour and consists on read/write
>> operation to debugfs file. GPIO device instance is still required in DSDT
>> table along with _AEI resources and event methods.
>>
>> Reading from file provides pin to GPIO device map e.g. :
>> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/gpio_event
>> GPIO device name: /__SB.GPI0
>> Available GPIO pin map:
>> /__SB.GPI0 <-> pin 0x100
>>
>> Based on that, user can trigger method corresponding to device pin number:
>> $ echo "/__SB.GPI0 0x100" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/gpio_event
>
> I need input from Rafael and Mika as to whether this is a
> good interface.
>
> It seems a bit confusing for me: why do you have to extract
> a number from one file and then insert the same magic number
> somewhere else?

Good point! Available GPIO event pins should be listed as debugfs node, 
then user would write e.g. 1 to one particular. Sounds simpler.

Regards,
Tomasz Nowicki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ